The Grenade Launcher is 300 Year Old Technology

Discussion in 'Halo and Forge Discussion' started by Ladnil, May 10, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Ladnil

    Ladnil Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,502
    Likes Received:
    0
    According to Bungie.net, the UNSC started using the M319 Grenade Launcher in 2263. The Fall of Reach takes place in 2552. This is the equivalent of the United States military fighting in Iraq with these:

    [​IMG]

    I'm not usually too picky about canon or anything, but wtf is up with that?
     
  2. Roland

    Roland Forerunner

    Messages:
    141
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's a game. In old games 2010 we should have flying cars and stuff. Idc about the technicalities.
     
  3. Spicy Forges

    Spicy Forges Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,885
    Likes Received:
    37
    The grenade launcher is pawns so hard...
     
  4. pinohkio

    pinohkio Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,630
    Likes Received:
    8
    If it gets the job done, there's no need to improve on it; those muzzle loaders you have posted were unreliable, one-shot, inaccurate weapons, therefore, the've been replaced.
    The grenade launcher on the other hand, probably serves the exact same role as it was meant to, so it's no surprise that it's still around in the Halo universe.
     
  5. Roland

    Roland Forerunner

    Messages:
    141
    Likes Received:
    0
    And, I found out earlier today, when you Noob-Tube a vehicle (like a wraith in my situation) the vehicle gets EMPed. As if you shot it with a charged plasma pistol.
     
    #5 Roland, May 10, 2010
    Last edited: May 10, 2010
  6. Red Army

    Red Army Forerunner

    Messages:
    746
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have but one question.

    Who cares?
     
  7. Pegasi

    Pegasi Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,423
    Likes Received:
    22
    If not you, then my question is why you bothered posting at all. I'm 99% sure Ladnil didn't post this thread with the express hope of receiving spammy and rather glib replies, so yeah....

    True enough, but still, 300 years? Surely in that time there would have been at least one technological advancement, however slight, which warranted a tweak or remodel of some kind. 300 years without the need for a change sounds like a pretty stagnant civilisation tbh, methinks you found a Bungie.net typo. Whereabouts did you find it?
     
  8. Ladnil

    Ladnil Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,502
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's in the weapon description in the service record.

    As for why I care, I don't really. I said right there in the OP I don't usually care about canon. 300 years seems like an extremely long time though, it doesn't make a lot of sense.
     
  9. Katanga

    Katanga Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,090
    Likes Received:
    91
    My reasoning is that Spartan III's, and possibly the entirety of Reach, would have resorted to outdated weaponry in a last ditch effirt to save the planet. True, it's a bit iffy. But don't tell bungie, or they might take my precious gun from me. :(
     
  10. oh knarly

    oh knarly Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    563
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sure its old technology but it still does the same thing. I wouldn't want to get hit by one of those rifles, they fire puny cannon balls which are just as good at killing people. Sure modern weapons are much more efficient and effective but both fill out the same function.
     
  11. pyro

    pyro The Joker
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,703
    Likes Received:
    4
    A bow and arrow will pierce some body armor bullets will not. One thing about humans is always constant: you die. It just depends on what is best at completing that. What advances have affected a knife. It still kills the same.
     
  12. Insane54

    Insane54 Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,028
    Likes Received:
    10
    They still don't USE bow and arrows and such. It's simply not efficient....the idea of "if it ain't broke, don't fit it" doesn't really apply, especially to weapons engineers. I'm pretty sure 300 years is way too long to still be using a weapon, must be a typo.
     
  13. Ladnil

    Ladnil Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,502
    Likes Received:
    0
    The stainless steel combat knives with specialized edges for different functions of today are a lot more advanced than any blade 300 years ago. You'd think somewhere along the line the UNSC would develop some kind of upgrade to grenade launcher technology.

    Maybe in the campaign the Spartans will raid a military technology museum and all will be explained. Or maybe the thing is just the AK-47 of the future. Though even that is only 60 years old.
     
  14. stouf761

    stouf761 Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,256
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well obviously it probably has grenadier rifling or something, maybe a more accurate scope. If I recall correctly, a whole age went by where people used the same shape of club.

    All a grenade launcher needs to do is launch a grenade. Any more range and you could just as easily strap a rocket to it....
    Grenades are probably more explosive, but its not like you would need a plastic explosive launcher when you have a rocket launcher on hand.
     
    #14 stouf761, May 10, 2010
    Last edited: May 10, 2010
  15. R Richard P26

    R Richard P26 Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    503
    Likes Received:
    0
    I was talking to a friend about a concept close to this a few years ago.

    Why would humans even still be using bullets at that time? We already have the neccessary technology to make lasers (There is an anti-ICBM version mounted on a 747 that is currently being produced) by that time we should have weapons that could probably outclass even the covenant
     
  16. stouf761

    stouf761 Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,256
    Likes Received:
    0
    Cost-efficiency ratio
     
  17. Duckyz

    Duckyz Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    653
    Likes Received:
    0
    i would have thought there would have been a sort of belt fed grenade launcher
    or a 6 shot rotational
    not one shot reload
     
  18. stouf761

    stouf761 Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,256
    Likes Received:
    0
    Duckyz they actually do have one of those 6 shot revolver style already, as in present real life.

    To elaborate on Richard's comment and my response;
    Its always cheaper to stick a piece of lead in somebody's head than to burn a hole in it with a high wattage light.
     
  19. Duckyz

    Duckyz Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    653
    Likes Received:
    0
    yea thats what i was thinking of, they have both, belt fed and six shot, (weaponology on discovery, i got bored)
    or even a cartrage* style for easy manuverabilty*

    and burning holes in peoples heads is funner than a peice of lead... just guessing
     
  20. R Richard P26

    R Richard P26 Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    503
    Likes Received:
    0
    Still, gunpowder was less cost efficient than bows and arrows, evevntually a point will be crossed and I belive it will be well before 2552 or whenevet Halo is
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page