Achievement Unlocked: Being A ****ing Retard I am the fool? Basically all you are doing is saying, you suck. You could at least attempt to tell something constructive. You could tell someone, do this to make it better. It dosen't help that you constantly say everything is fail. You also say do not forge on pre-dlc. What an ignorant remark! Some of the best maps are made pre-dlc and thats how ForgeHub was started. I really think you do not know anything about forge. Show me a map that YOU have made. Wow. Contradict much? PS: Do not double post, you ****ing ignorant hypocrite.
That is constructive? Wow, I cannot see how that would help anything at all. If that's all you get from a review, then why get a review. This is how to review maps.
wow. hypocrite. all your reveiw on my map Vandam Keep (as read above) is, is complaints about not enough cover. wow. just wow bLeEp Bl0oP : super hypocritical ironic statemnt combo!
Why are you even here? To flame me? Please either ask me to rate one of your maps like you are supposed to or leave my thread.
I love how you ignore everything I say and tell me to leave.It is fine for you to flame my true statement earlier, but when I point out how you are wrong, like you do. I actually told you how to review better.
Uh so basically you rate maps by how much you enjoyed them? That really makes no sense at all. If you would rate maps for a hobby or a job, I dont think anyone would follow it because their based on how much you "enjoyed" them... ya I would come up with a better way.. Edit: So now basically you think you are in charge of everything and think that its very simple to pick a fight with wats a scope and assuming people are going to take your side... You lost my respect.... if you care or not, honestly i dont.... I mean really i lol'ed, who are you?
Listen. I find it rather generous for you to review maps solely on discussing the flaws, and trying to give the creator insight on what to fix. But seeing the hard feelings being made, people don't really enjoy your way of doing it. In my opinion, I could care less. If you're trying to show me faults in my map, then I couldn't care about how you explained it, but some people do. I'm not asking you to stop doing this for we need more people like you who actually download the map and play it. But to stop people from flaming you, and to prevent anymore bickering in this thread, I recommend you submit your information in a nice respectable way. I know this sounds kind of controlling, and is if I have higher authority over you, but I'm trying to help you. As I said before, I find it quite fine for someone to point flaws out and could care less about how they executed it. But some people receive mixed feelings with comments on their maps like these as you can already tell. Please consider my suggestion.
how about this idea. if you don't like the way he critiques maps, then leave the thread and let it dissapear. by continuously posting you have kept the thread up at the top and giving it more attention than a good thread ever really gets. If you don't like 'em don't bother 'em also i would like to know if you have had a look at my map yet.
and you are? ya its not that i dont like it I just mentioned how I dont think that it is a very professional way of rating maps, and I dont think it should be trusted only because its based on someones opinion on how much they liked it
Nor did I assume that. Rather don't you want people to utilize your advice, rather then feel rage towards it? While most aren't here to make social bonds, we can all help everyone as you're doing now. Just people suddenly feel offended by your way of going about. Now if you don't take my advice, hopefully people will learn to deal with it, and actually use it.
well i am a person who gets annoyed at people who flame these threads. This thread has four pages of pointless posts saying pretty much the same thing over and over. i agree he should improve the delivery of his criticism, but i think it is rather stupid this thread has gotten the attention it has. give him constructive criticism that is different from the person before you. he will get the point or you can let the thread sink. Now talking to aj would you rate my map and try to improve the delivery with how to improve not just what is wrong. I agree the bad stuff should be there, just say how to improve it or don't critique.
I like your idea of honesty and i believe harshness will help people, but don't review a map on just the bad things or it isn't nowhere near a serious review. Why would i want a review from you, especially with how non-serious your reviews are. I would rather go to someone else and get a review on everything about the map besides the bad things. Look at the map as a whole. Then your reviews will be taken A LOT more seriously. Point out the things that need improving with 100% honesty (which is really needed because I see so many bullshit map posts on here it isn't funny), but also point out what you liked about the map as well with that honesty. Until you do these, I will never take you seriously and would only send a map to you for shits and giggles, that is until you make changes like the ones i mentioned above
While I don't agree with the way your critique maps nor the scores that you have given these maps I do have to say the way that you have gone about doing this is not as offensive and ridiculous as some of my colleagues have stated. The way you critique maps is not the conventional way we do it here on Forgehub, which is why I suppose you are receiving so much negativity towards something you had all good intentions with. We usually rate maps based on other things besides enjoyability. Although that is a factor we do not base this solely on the enjoyability. As for your delivery of said comments there is also no problem with that either. If he decides to only to point out the negative qualities of a map why should that affect anyone. He is pointing out flaws in a map and from reading some of his post they were actually quite well informed. His review of Remedy, while i believed differently on some points, had a very sensible argument. He praised Linou's forging abilities and prowess but still pointed out things that could have been improved. Also who's to say if a review is correct or not. A review is written in the opinion of the author. It should not be held as fact because fact it is not. It is based solely on the opinion of the author. So for those of you who disagree, like myself, with his critique, you will just have to live with the fact that he dislikes the maps that regard in such a high caliber. So, please guys back off. Reviews are opinions so take it for what it is, whether you agree or disagree, calm or enraged, happy or sad. It is his choice to review the maps as he wishes, when he wishes and in whatever manner he wishes. "wall of text" copyright 2008 by Sharpshooter inc.
you seriously copy righted your own wall of text. Although yes he has a very original way or "grading" maps by critisizing, I personally dont think that will help people fix that in a v2 i personally think that the response to that will be not by fixing the problem, thus it would be like a remark back towards the person saying like " get out of here " or like " your opinion doesn't matter or even " You didn't have to critisize me " But if you would review someone's map I would put at the beginning " WARNING I WILL CRITISIZE YOUR MAP. But still i think that people will take it in an offensive way. "wall of text" copyright 2008 by eguitarplaya33 inc. ^rofl^