im arguing your stupidity. if you werent you would see this, but intestines arent transparent. so what youre saying is this inane sense of logic that only i get must be wrong because youve said this? just like ive said you arent funny? isnt this a paradox? [/sarc][/ofi] stating im better than people? try again. im arguing with you about the fact that you and chuck are sooooo keen to discredit me, that you discredit yourselves to do so. you keep going on about my ego, when you are the prime candidate for this. you dont realise it and that makes you a hypocrite. we all may throw brags to the wind, we're ****ing gamers. i dont go on about it, or try to shove a point down peoples throat.
i honestly dont think anybody can 1-up cousin ITs facebook artist list. Tusk, i envy your music enthusiasm.
holy crap I lol'd did you just tell me to try again when you haven't addressed anything I've said without retreading? every point you've made I've addressed, every single one. So that summary post of yours needs some updating. please look at my posts, figure out what's been said OUTSIDE that mind of yours, then try again, otherwise you aren't worth the time. it's really just sad how ignorant you are at this point.
let me set the scene: texan says: i hate this computer generated radio trash everyone says: but we love electro how can you not? texan says: my thing. your thing. everyone says: here's our things, do you see how our thing is not radio trash? other ones say: our things too! qkt says: my things are all those things? cool right? everyone says: cool story bro sarge says: WAAAH YOUR EGO EGO EGO EGO EGO. it just carries on in a loop. youve said youve addressed it(whereas youve avoided it - see above for another example), but i restated what my point was. let me do it again. youre not funny, ive never found you funny, i dont believe there's been a time youve been found funny by a wider audience than one or two show me an instance of a funny you've made. are you still in the dark? you keep trying to paint this picture of this facepalm, but you're sitting in the wrong chair.
Jack is the one who gives you the key to the wiggly worm. Music and Cooking are my two favorite things. I'm listing to that Deadmau5 link right now, I defiantly have more respect from him and his ideas behind dubstep.
it was correct until the part where you jump in: QKT: "I'm sorry but I have the widest taste in music here" translation to normal people who aren't douches "I like more music than you, which makes me better. I didn't need to state that I liked more music than anyone else here, I could have just posted the videos and that would've been it. But I like bragging about how much better than everyone I am, because I'm a douche, but not self-aware." Sarge: "::insert translation:: hahahahahaa" There, we boiled it down to the simple roots. Do you understand now? Edit: Lol back to the bit about funny. I addressed that ENTIRE scenario. I said it was an opinion, which you argued as fact, which is not possible in any scenario unless it can be objectively measured, which is impossible. Opinions based on fact, not on other opinions can, by definition, be "facts." Then you returned and just kept circling around stating "YOU'RE MISSING THE POINT." The point I addressed and rephrased several times, which you didn't understand. Try harder.
i think this means you should aspire to be the first guy to start a cooking show driven by music WUBWUB WUB WUBWUBWUB *shaking salt shaker to the beat*
I love that song so much. Soooo ****ing much. I listened to it like 20 times the same day I found out about it.
i put this in a straight sentence to you so you can TRY to address it. what is to say that you arent stating opinion when you say that the logic i use is only understood by me. [br][/br]Edited by merge: you missed MY point.
because you are using "logic" that isn't logic as used by western civilization. Roundabout logic, is literally called "circular logic" logic that tries to prove it is logical by using parts from itself as proof. It's like using the word in the definition. That is why it is a fact. Because logic, in the modern sense, is concrete. What you're arguing, that your logic is logical, is false. You can state the "logic behind something" in terms of "thinking" but it does not literally mean the action, or thought process behind it is "logical." Summary so you understand. You are using circular logic, which is not "logic" in the sense that anyone uses it.
the fact that you A) wanted to go through and take a census is sad enough B) you're operating on the assumption that anything and everything I do is an attempt to be funny. C) you aren't posting names. I could (falsely) say that I took a census and everyone involved said you were a douche, and there'd be no way of proving otherwise. Your logic is bad logic. Try again.
I just used Youtube. The unedited version flows better. The motown feel, but modern hip-hop tone behind Cee-Lo, so ****ing amazing. I had no idea he was a part of Gnarls Barkley lol.