Pink Cutie

Ugghhh you dirty brushwhore. No blending, bad lighting, did I mention brush *****?

 

I dont like that....lightswitch(?) in the background, it distracts from the focal. And the fact that she has basicaly nothing on her thats pink, and all your brushwork is pink is meh.

No offense, but can you go back to making your non "real person" sigs?

 

This is his second signature with a real person. Rome wasn't built in a day...

I don't like it very much, especially because there's no blending. But keep at it.

 

yes not liking it. not liking the brushes to be specific. not depth

 

Yet this sig was probably made in 20 minutes.

 

GTFO. Please.


Despite what the rest are saying, i rather like the brushes-i can't really see anything else that would have fitted, and i think it goes with her jacket. I think the other colours need to stick out a bit more. Now, with this particular stock (and with many real-life stocks) the flow is poor, which means one would have to make up for it with extensive editing. I would advise fishing around to find better stocks that have better flow etc. to start off with, then experiment with the harder stocks.

I think some blocky clipping masks could work here to add to the effects. Also i would advise a more prominent light source near the bottom mid-left of the tag. For depth, i think your as far as can be there, maybe burn the bg?

Keep up the experimenting Rabittt.

 

Well how long did it take to make this?

+

I love his non real person sigs, they were amazing, i just dont think his real person style is working out with the same brushwork and clipping masks etc etc.

 

It's not a literal saying. These things take time to develop. You don't go to a newer graphic artist and go "you're awful, try another medium." The same principal applies. RaBBiiTTT is learning a new style. Sure, it's far from perfect, but he'll improve.

That said, at least you gave good critique.

As for the sig, maybe put some brushes over her, and make the BG fit the focal a bit more.