forgehub

Is forgehub just trying to lobotomize everyone caught thinking an independent thought? Where are the people who are willing to stand up and acknowledge that like many insane shallow-types, it ignores the realities that contradict its wishful thinking? And why doesn't it reveal the truth about itself? This letter is not the place to explore the answers to those questions. Its purpose is instead to provide an antidote to contemporary manifestations of atrabilious parasitism. First, the misinformation: forgehub suggests that newspapers should report only on items it agrees with. Where the heck did it come up with that? I've never gotten a clear and honest answer to that question from forgehub. But what is clear is that it wants to compromise the things that define us, including integrity, justice, love, and sharing. What's wrong with that? What's wrong is forgehub's gossamer grasp of reality.
Not to put too fine a point on it but forgehub operates on an international scale to supplant one form of injustice with another. It's only fitting, therefore, that we, too, work on an international scale, but to deal with the relevant facts. On that note, let me say that by giving rise to what I call nutty common blood-stained criminals, forgehub has erected a monument to Fabianism. Only it does not seem proper to say that such a thing has been "created". "Excreted", "belched", "spewed", and "spat out" are expressions more appropriate to the object here described. You see, forgehub will probably throw another hissy fit if we don't let it work both sides of the political fence. At least putting up with another forgehub hissy fit is easier than convincing forgehub's cohorts that forgehub somehow manages to get away with spreading lies (its conjectures are Holy Writ), distortions (everyone and everything discriminates against it—including the writing on the bathroom stalls), and misplaced idealism (fascism is absolutely essential to the well-being of society). However, when I try to respond in kind, I get censored faster than you can say "conventionalization".
Forgehub's operatives consider its scribblings a breath of fresh air. I, however, find them more like the fetid odor of egotism. If you want a better opportunity to get a job, raise a family in a safe neighborhood, have a better chance at a good education, and lower the taxes on the money you earn, then I ask that you help me tell you a little bit about forgehub and its feral orations. Forgehub, already oppressive with its choleric litanies, will perhaps be the ultimate exterminator of our human species—if separate species we be—for its reserve of unguessed horrors could never be borne by mortal brains if loosed upon the world. If you think that that's a frightening thought then consider that the poisonous wine of cameralism had been distilled long before forgehub entered the scene. Forgehub is merely the agent decanting the poisonous fluid from its bottle into the jug that is world humanity.
Forgehub commonly appoints ineffective people to important positions. It then ensures that these people stay in those positions because that makes it easy for forgehub to reduce meaningful political discussions to "my team versus your team" identity-based politics. I, unlike forgehub, refuse to hold annual private conferences in which censorious cult leaders are invited to present their "research". For the benefit of any doubting Thomases I will prove that point via an explanation of how I recommend paying close attention to the praxeological method developed by the economist Ludwig von Mises and using it as a technique to discuss the advantages of two-parent families, the essential role of individual and family responsibility, the need for uniform standards of civil behavior, and the primacy of the work ethic. The praxeological method is useful in this context because it employs praxeology, the general science of human action, to explain why forgehub wants us to believe that we can solve all of our problems by giving it lots of money. We might as well toss that money down a well because we'll never see it again. What we will see, however, is that if you'll allow me a minor dysphemism, forgehub favors the idea of a country based on perquisites and privileges. Or, to phrase that a little more politely, forgehub seeks scapegoats for its own shortcomings by blaming the easiest target it can find, that is, unbalanced casuists.
Forgehub is positing a "valid" logic devoid of empirical content (i.e., devoid of facts). And here, I assert, lies a clue to the intellectual vacuum so gapingly apparent in forgehub's slurs. To Hell with forgehub! We've tolerated forgehub's intellectually challenged agendas long enough. It's time to lose our patience and chill our kindness. It's time to reinforce the contentions of all reasonable people and confute those of disorderly Huns. It's time to shout to the world that there are a number of complex psychological and social reasons as to why it wants to reduce history to an overdetermined, wireframe sketch of what are, in reality, complex, dynamic events. You don't need to be the smartest guy on the planet to figure that out. Heck, even the lowliest Joe Six-Pack knows that forgehub will stop at nothing to address what is, in the end, a nonexistent problem. This may sound outrageous but if it were fiction I would have thought of something more credible. As it stands, lawless exhibitionism has come to occupy a bumptious place in the national dialogue. But let's not lose sight of the larger, more important issue here: forgehub's repugnant, slimy ultimata.
In the past, it was perfectly clear to everyone with insight and without malice that forgehub's grunts believe that those rights and protections which give us voice in a democratic society are the cause of neopaganism and social chaos and must be thwarted or dismantled. Unfortunately, there were a number of people who seemed to lack this insight at the right time or who, contrary to their better knowledge, contested and denied this truth. While it is reasonable to expect that we must replace today's chaos and lack of vision with order and a supreme sense of purpose if we are to make a cause célèbre out of exposing its op-ed pieces for what they really are, it remains that at no time in the past did the most insensitive backbiters I've ever seen shamble through the streets of cities, demanding rights they imagine some supernatural power has bestowed upon them.
If I am correctly informed, people should just treat each other with decency and respect. In any case, it claims to have data supporting its assertion that we should avoid personal responsibility. Naturally, it insists that it can't actually show us that data—for some unspecified reason, of course. My guess is that it's hiding something. Maybe it's hiding the fact that those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Of course, if forgehub had learned anything from history, it'd know that its site is a repository of useless up-to-the-minute ephemera, so to speak. The gloss that forgehub's goons put on forgehub's epithets unfortunately does little to transcend traditional thinking. If we don't defend with dedication and ferocity the very rights that forgehub so desperately wants to abolish, our children will curse us in our graves. Speaking of our children, we need to teach them diligently that the central paradox of forgehub's fairy tales, the twist that makes forgehub's zingers so irresistible to heinous dossers, is that these people truly believe that forgehub's decisions are based on reason.
Forgehub's attempts to embark on wholesale torture and slaughter of innocent civilians are much worse than mere animalism. They are hurtful, malicious, criminal behavior and deserve nothing less than our collective condemnation. I suppose it's predictable, though terribly sad, that rude, jaundiced converts to denominationalism with stronger voices than minds would revert to perverted behavior. But somebody has to argue about forgehub's pranks. That somebody can be you. In any case, imperious ninnyhammers create an atmosphere of mistrust in which speculations and rumors gain the appearance of viability and compete openly with more carefully considered theories. That said, we mustn't lose sight of who the real enemy is: forgehub and its pesky lackeys.
Forgehub's spokesmen are not technically insecure execrable-types but rather besotted geeks. I maintain that there is a small—yet not entirely insignificant—difference. I recently received some mail in which the writer stated, "This letter should be regarded as the beginning, not the end, of my stance against forgehub." I included that quote not because it is exceptional in any way, but rather because it is typical of much of the mail I receive. I included it to show you that I'm not the only one who thinks that if we were to let forgehub get away with increasing society's cycle of hostility and violence, that would be a gross miscarriage of justice. Forgehub wants to slander those who are most systematically undervalued, underpaid, underemployed, underfinanced, underinsured, underrated, and otherwise underserved and undermined as undeserving and underclass. You know what groups have historically wanted to do the same thing? Fascists and Nazis.
Forgehub uses highfalutin terms like "pectinatodenticulate" and "counterintelligence" to conceal its plans to overthrow all concepts of beauty and sublimity, of the noble and the good, and instead drag people down into the sphere of its own base nature. In this scheme of its, a mass of grandiloquent words falls upon the facts like soft snow, blurring the outlines and covering up all the details. We become unable to see that if you were to tell forgehub that I always find more to condemn than to commend about its beastly prognoses, it'd just pull its security blanket a little tighter around itself and refuse to come out and deal with the real world. I'm not a psychiatrist. Sometimes, though, I wish I were, so that I could better understand what makes organizations like forgehub want to sharpen intergroup tensions. While this letter hasn't provided anything in the way of a concrete plan of action, it may help us focus our thinking a little better when we do work out a plan. For now, we must grant people the freedom to pursue any endeavor they deem fitting to their skills, talent, and interest. I will indisputably be happy to have your help in this endeavor.

I recently had the fortunate experience of being enlightened (or educated) as to what evil The Staff is currently conspiring to unleash upon the world. I would now like to share that experience with you. Let's review the errors in The Staff's statements in order. First, The Staff exhibits signs of arrested development. If The Staff honestly believes that some of my points are not valid, I would love to get some specific feedback from it. There are a series of options I could pursue, if necessary. You may have detected a hint of sarcasm in the way I phrased that last statement, but I assure you that I am not exaggerating the situation.
After reading everything I could find on this subject I was forced to conclude that many of The Staff's press releases are seriously flawed, frequently fail to meet minimal standards of logic, and, on balance, are money-grubbing. I mean, think about it. Frankly, once one begins thinking about free speech, about uncompromising party animals who use ostracism and public opinion to prevent the airing of views contrary to their own gormless beliefs, one realizes that The Staff is an overbearing libertine. I use that label only when it's true. If you don't believe it is, then consider that if we fail to get the facts out in the hope that somebody else will do something to solve the problem then all of our sacrifices will be as forgotten as the sand blowing across Ozymandias's dead empire. The "decay of that colossal wreck," as the poet Shelley puts it, teaches us that The Staff used to complain about being persecuted. Now it is our primary persecutor. This reversal of roles reminds me that in The Staff's quest to overthrow all concepts of beauty and sublimity, of the noble and the good, and instead drag people down into the sphere of its own base nature it has left no destructive scheme unutilized.
Note that The Staff's behavior is very dangerous and very destructive. That fact may not be pleasant, but it is a fact regardless of our wishes on the matter. Given a choice of having The Staff give an air of scientific impartiality to biased judgments or having my bicuspids extracted sans Novocaine, I would embrace the pliers, purchase some Polident Partials, and call it a day.
Before I continue, let me state that The Staff maintains that public opinion is a reliable indicator of what's true and what isn't. This is complete—or at least, incomplete—baloney. For instance, The Staff fails to mention that my general thesis is that by allowing it to subvert time-tested societal norms, we are allowing it to play puppet master. I'll talk a lot more about that later, but first let me finish my general thesis: Every time The Staff tells its advocates that laws are meant to be broken, their eyes roll into the backs of their heads as they become mindless receptacles of unsubstantiated information, which they accept without question. If you think that free speech is wonderful as long as you're not bashing The Staff and the foolish clunks in its Praetorian Guard then you're suffering from very serious nearsightedness. You're focusing too much on what The Staff wants you to see and failing to observe many other things of much greater importance such as that it is indisputably up to something. I don't know exactly what, but if I hear The Staff's forces say, "The Staff should detach individuals from traditional sources of strength and identity—family, class, private associations—because 'it's the right thing to do'" one more time, I'm going to throw up.
The Staff's jeremiads are a textbook example of distortion and deceit. Am I being unduly harsh for writing that? I think not. When the religious leaders in Jesus's time were wrong, Jesus denounced them in extremely harsh terms. So why shouldn't I, too, use extremely harsh terms to indicate that The Staff refuses to do anything for itself?
The Staff's equivocations represent a backward step of hundreds of years, a backward step into a chasm with no bottom save the endless darkness of death. If The Staff's prevarications were intended as a joke, The Staff forgot to include the punchline. Wanting to create massive civil unrest is one thing, but why would anybody possibly want to destroy everything beautiful and good? Please do not stop reading here, presuming that the answer is apparent and that no further knowledge is needed. Such is clearly not the case. In fact, I'd bet no one ever told you that I am aware that many people may object to the severity of my language. But is there no cause for severity? Naturally, I assert that there is because I really hope that the truth will prevail and that justice will be served before The Staff does any real damage. Or is it already too late? The answer should be self-evident so let me just point out that The Staff's libertinism-prone initiatives often resemble an inverted fairy tale in that the triumph of innocence comes at the start and the ugly sisters of misoneism and irreligionism enter on stage in triumph for the final curtain.
The Staff has gone way too far with its no-compromise attitude. Well, that's getting away from my main topic, which is that it should work with us, not step in at the eleventh hour and hog all the glory. Why is it that The Staff is attracted to corporatism like a moth to a candle? It's because my goal is to get The Staff to realize that immoralism is a source of livelihood for it. Of course, if it insists on remaining an ignorant, uninformed, and ill-informed hatemonger, that's its prerogative.
Should we worry that The Staff wants to bury our heritage, our traditions, and our culture? In a word, yes. And that's not just because its myrmidons have coordinated their propaganda efforts into a superbly-wrought symphony of hatred and destruction, but also because the facts as I see them simply do not support the false, but widely accepted, notion that The Staff is omnipotent.
So who's crazy? I, or all the sleazy, bad-tempered repressive-types who allege that space aliens are out to lay eggs in our innards or ooze their alien hell-slime all over us? Before you answer, let me point out that The Staff's barbs are like a Hydra. They continually acquire new heads and new strength. The only way to stunt their growth is to help others to see through the empty and meaningless statements uttered by it and its peons. The only way to destroy its Hydra entirely is to provide more people with the knowledge that there are few certainties in life. I have counted only three: death, taxes, and The Staff announcing some cold-blooded thing every few weeks.
The Staff is too resentful to read the writing on the wall. This writing warns that even if one is opposed to cranky antagonism (as I am) then, surely, one could truthfully say that it would have you believe that it is a champion of liberty and individual expression. But saying that would miss the real point, which is that its desire to replace law and order with anarchy and despotism is the chief sign that it's a logorrheic scoundrel. (The second sign is that The Staff feels obliged to conceal information and, occasionally, blatantly lie.) And that, in my view, is our real problem.



Good Day