is it teh goodness? I made it with default brushes/text Terrack or w/e your sig's text is too grunge for the type of sig, and it seems too many people are using hot chicks as a draw in
Hmmm I'd like a review of my work, cause I always love to improve so here's it: Probably my best(was one of my requests)^
Okay Pirates.... Yours seems way too bland. I like what you have going but it just isn't there. The whatever you did to make the dots or whatever looks good but I think that you should add more than just a gradient background the outline on the render works good though.
uuummm....terrax last time i checked u weren't .core, nor did you give extensively awesome critiques....leave it to .core........
I would like a critique of my current signature. I haven't Gimped up a serious signature in monthes. Thank you.
CaM- Ok, first look at the sig is great. You have the color scheme, balance, and a nice focal point. I just have a few minor problems with it. The blending on the left part of the eye is kind of obvious. If this was blended better, that would look amazing. Another problem is the "PLEX" part in "COMPLEXITY". I understand the contour aspect of it, though, so its fine. I would just suggest compromising the colors so the middle is a little darker. I really like the little designs on the right(what did you use for those?). So that's pretty much my review on it. I have nothing else because I love the rest. Overall, I say: Spoiler 9.6/10. A fien job sur!
yeah I know your offline but I was just wondering what you thought of my current signature... here it is incase your cookies are acting up anyway I just want advice for the whole sig... Oh and I use gimp so if its extensive things like add a layer mask and stuff becareful cause I'm in gimp idk if you use it.
Ice- Wow. Very nice sig. I love the style and the grainy look of the background. The colors are cramazing(crazy amazing) and work well with eachother. Um, one problem is the lack of a border. To me, they separate what you're supposed to be looking at and what you're not. Another problem is the text. It's stock and very plain, but a substitute for another plain font might work. I say download and start testing some different ones. And the last complaint is the size. I like the render, and the quality is great, but a smaller size would look friggin' awesome. That are mah review. This may be one of the nicest-looking sigs I've seen. So your rating is: Spoiler 9.4/10. Happyface
Stoj- The color is what really draws you into your sig. I think that was smart. The second one is better to me because I don't like the smudgy effect on the first one. The more pronounced lines on the second one is also a great feature. I'm still debating whether the Spartan is a good focal point or not, because it blends well with the background. Although that's the intention, I could see some confusion. I'm going to say it is a good focal point because it works well with the rest of the sig. The purple on the left seems a little out of place, but I like it. It gives variation. The text looks nice how it follows the line of the(AR?). But yeah, that's my review on it. So my rating is: Spoiler 9.7/10. Now go and celebrate, you silly goose.
wow that was way better feedback than I thought I would get... anyway heres a few more versions based on what you said. I already had a border version when you said that... black border differnt text... brown border... smaller black border... smaller brown border...
=D Thanks Nor. I didn't actually notice that purple bit but thanks for pointing it out, LMAO. I used that wallpaper I made a while back for a C4D, or effects and it worked REALLY well. Search for 'Stoj's first wallpaper' if you want to use it, it works best on a sig when set to lighten. His weapon is a spiker I'm pretty sure. Thanks again for the review.