Well, what I mean by they have no rights is essentially that our rights come before animals. and also what i'm trying to say is that we should use animals for whatever we can but we should not waste animals, or anything for that matter.
?! So which is it? You've said animals have no rights and now you are saying that they may have rights but out rights come first. Do you think animals have any rights to certain treatments by humans? There are currently hundreds, if not thousands, of laws on record legislating how we can treat animals. Your doctrine seems to be that we can do whatever we want with them as long as we don't "waste" them. Where do you draw the line on animal treatment? Are you saying there is no line?