While I'm refraining to give my own opinion, because I haven't seen it, the real argument on everyone elses side seems to be the fact that it's written poorly, acted poorly, and cinematographic done in a less than ideal way. I don't know why you're stuck on the "needz maor actiunz" thing. lol. And sorry, no more caps-lock for Stouf.
I'm not on the "needs moar actiunz" thing, I'm on the "this isn't your standard hollywood war movie, so don't judge it as such" It is straight up propoganda with some moral connections regarding sacrifice.
I'm judging it based on the standard of it being a movie. And it was a really bad movie. "It is straight up propoganda with some moral connections regarding sacrifice." Pretty much.