Frag Man

When's the last time you've even been online? >__>

Hey Frag, have you ever been in a TGIF?

What about half time?

Your sports cliché doesn't make sense in this conversation.

"You're" bench?

You're the star player in this football game, Fraggy, only way you're out of this one is a loss or a foul. ;)

You've earned yourself the privelige of watching me "lawl" at your expense from the sidelines.

Good day.

Quote of the Day:

If it's stupid, do it. If it's stupid, AND immature, then don't.

Meh, your life.... I am going to go do some stupid stuff.

Yet again, you didn't take in the full meaning of my message. I said that the insinuator (starter) of the argument is to blame. If another member starts hassling you about something, and it erupts into an argument, of course it wouldn't be your fault. However, if the other party wishes to end the argument, and you continue, then obviously it's going to be your fault. You've said many times that enjoy arguing more than anything else on this site. Obviously, when you are arguing you forget about everything else, and become focused upon that, and subsequently, you become blind to the rules. This is unacceptable, and the reason why pretty much no one enjoys your presence on this forum.

Thanks, but cmon, I highly recommend you stop debating so much, instead of arguing with everyone you could be having fun.

Erm... Ok... *Walks away slowly*

Fraggy... Maybe you should stop debating and be more of an idiot... Like me.

It appears to me that everyone is starting to hate you.

Yesh?!

The last sentence of your message just proved my theory right, you can't say something and not expect a reply in this style of environment, and seeing as you a provoked it in the thread, then it is therefore your fault.

You agreed with me, I win.

No, had you actually read my message, you would have noticed that I said that the insinuator of the argument is the one who is to blame due to the fact that internet anonymity fuels people to never back down as they have little to lose, leaving them in a position where there is nothing to divert them from the argument. Now, as we were discussing the BigBucketsBilbo thread, it is clear that you are the insinuator of the argument, partly due to your personality and partly for some of your prior comments. I never blamed any other arguments on you unnecessarily.

Perhaps, but you have been in enough arguments (you said yourself that you enjoy them) to realise that people will not easily step down from a contest (which arguments can be classified as) especially if they have little to nothing to lose, which is the case on the internet due to it's anonymity factor.
So obviously, as you are the one insinuating the argument (at least in this particular case) you are in fact the one to blame, and you cannot claim that they could just step down and back away from the argument as that is not in any humans' nature.

Ah, but it is selfish and parsimonious to continue to act in a way that other people find annoying, and especially if they have clearly stated so to yourself.

At times you were, and you were also being quite hypocritical and sometimes just stupid...

http://www.forgehub.com/forum/halo-screenshots/47433-christmas-photoshopping-contest.html
thought you might find this of interest

From your post in Big BucketsBilbo's thread: "He can't ban me without any reliable reason."

Well, I'm sure that if we banned you for having a negative impact on the site on a major scale, or for being a malcontent, no one would argue against it... I mean, it's hard to argue against the truth...

Quote of the Day:

Sadness is brought to those who accept it.