xSharpshooter94

It was good some really nice kill and no scope ect but I personally think you should have chosen song(probably because i prefer hard rock) but whatever thats just me. Good editing considering you're not a pro at it. But you and awkward had fun making it and thats all that matters.

I just saw the tage

I just saw this, and I absolutely had to screen-cap it. lol!

Edit: Hmm. Looks like Photobucket's down. I guess you'll have to look at it later. :/

adios.

yarp.

very well.

Oh...I see. But hasn't he heard of the 5th Ammendment? I should not be tried for the same crime twice.

well you can't be fair if you're looking at everything subjectively.

you can spare good members that made mistakes or you can be fair

you cant have both. FH is about equality, which is why I keep it objective.

Ahh, I see, but since I have already been delt with and the consequence has been delivered, wouldn't it be best to leave it as it is?

@Sarge, you have been in the Lol Box several times when S5, or Sweeney, has made both racist comments and VERY rude comments, and to my knowledge have done nothing.

Regardless of who it is, favoritism and bias shouldn't be brought into account.

I'd infract and ban CHUCK just the same as any other member if he did anything worth it. Some people feel differently, but I'm not one for sparing people on the basis of their past actions, they make a mistake, they're to be held liable for it.

I'm confused as to what is going on =(

not everyone deserves a second chance. the fact that i told him to stop talking to me and spamming my page with his defense of DQ (who got a second chance and squandered it btw) could be considered his first chance, because I couldve just done to him what I've done countless others and warned them before i started infracting for spam.

as for allowing DQ to use his account. He was already playing messenger, meaning there was absolutely no need for DQ to take over. Second, he was letting a BANNED member take over. Third, it is quite possibly the dumbest thing to let someone else control YOUR account when they themselves are/were a member, especially one with a track record such as DQs.

actually 4 instances of crude behavior, all of which are infractble themselves

furthermore, ban evasion = a ban itself. 6 points. no custom infraction. its literally a bannable offense.

ah.

and he provided access for DQ, meaning he was dumb enough to break a huge rule and open himself up to being banned. THAT is why we have passwords...he just gave it to a banned user so that they could have fun.

banned people are banned for a reason

so you go to school with Scar, no wonder you wrote that letter...

YouTube - Curb Your Enthusiasm Skin Head

Invite me to a party, nubfaic.

Invite me to a party, faicnub.

[IMG]