This is the most recent signature that I thought up. I think it came out pretty well for gimp, but I still can improve. Please tell me what I can so better for a v.2. EDIT: Well the left side was a little to open so I cropped it. V.1. V.2. (Blended the renders border) V.3. (Contrasted signature and added streamlines) Desaturated version
I can notice a little aliasing around the spartans. If you have some sort of feather effect for whatever photo editing program you're using, I suggest using that. If you don't, I guess just blur the edges. Other than that, you did an excellent job and I give it a 4/5
If I were you, I would just throw away the first sig. The second sig is a whole lot better. I can see you got a hold of a bad render or something because you can see the white line around the render. I would work on getting that render blending in with the background a little better and get some flow going. Looks good though 6/10
Very good. I like it, You are very good at this. Better then I am at least. Well I guess thats why I openned a practice shop... Well back to the sig: I like the second version better because it flows better. The first version is trash but the second has potential. I like what you did with so good job 4.5/5
Updated first post with two new variations. I honestly like how the desaturated one came out. Please tell me which signature you like the most.
Are you using GIMP or photoshop? I know nothing about photoshop but, if you use gimp you can just use the smudge tool and smudge the white lines away.