Sig Battle | eguitarplaya33 vs. Mace

Discussion in 'Off Topic' started by Mace, Mar 25, 2009.

  1. Mace

    Mace Old Tyme
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,445
    Likes Received:
    4
    Heres the battle. 2 of them actually.

    Battle 1. We each made a sig from a stock.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Battle 2. We each made a sig out of a theme : ODST

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    YOUR VOTE WILL NOT BE COUNTED IF YOU DO NOT POST A LEGITIMATE REASON WHY YOU LIKE ONE ABOVE THE OTHER. IF YOU KNOW OUR STYLES, AND SPOT THEM, PLEASE CONTINUE TO VOTE WITHOUT BIAS
     
  2. Icecikle

    Icecikle Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,931
    Likes Received:
    2
    Stock:
    Top one, the scan lines in the other one kinda ruins the stock and flow of the sig, neither of them is very good.

    Theme:
    Top one, better blending flow look and the bg of the other just doesn't go with the ODST...
     
  3. Pigglez

    Pigglez Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,199
    Likes Received:
    0
    EDIT:

    Oh but to vote,

    Stock 1:

    Sig 1:
    Although I don't really like monotone sigs, I like the sharp, rusting look to the sig.

    Stock 2:

    Sig 1:
    I really like the white effects used here, definitely well done and great BG, although the border is a killer...
     
    #3 Pigglez, Mar 25, 2009
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2009
  4. EGP

    EGP Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,037
    Likes Received:
    1
    Wow fail on our parts, hopefully people can just be unbiased and be honest enough to figure out. And maybe they are not smart enough to figure it out but most people on FH are very smart.
     
  5. iZumi

    iZumi Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    779
    Likes Received:
    0
    Stock: top one

    though there's no depth at all, the bottom one has no flow, blending, and i hate the size.

    Render: top one

    pretty decent effects, but off focal for a render like that, and the bottom one has no depth, effects, blending, or flow.
     
  6. mastersync23

    mastersync23 Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    578
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sig 1:
    I quite like the sharp, monotone. However, it is a bit bland.

    Sig 2:
    I prefer the modern, blue theme of it.

    Sig 3:
    Look, I'll come right out and say it. It's too choppy, and the border ruins it.

    Sig 4:
    I really don't like this one, because the background does not blend in at all. It makes the ODST look totally out of place.
     
  7. EGP

    EGP Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,037
    Likes Received:
    1
    Eh so can you elaborate? I really dont know what sigs you are voting for.
     
  8. Pigglez

    Pigglez Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,199
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think he just gave CnC instead of voting lol...
     
  9. iZumi

    iZumi Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    779
    Likes Received:
    0
    did you seriously just vote for all four sigs? good lord.
     
    #9 iZumi, Mar 25, 2009
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2009
  10. EGP

    EGP Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,037
    Likes Received:
    1
    I know for a fact that my second sig isn't all that great. But I sure do wish people would read the title of the the thread lol. Ok I guess a CnC is alright lol
     
  11. Knight Kninja

    Knight Kninja Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,190
    Likes Received:
    1
    Battle 1: Sig 1- although neither of them were great, the colours of this one drew me in more, and also the second one was kinda ugly size wise. the sharpening was pretty good and the BG waasnt too bad for being abstract.

    Battle 2: Sig 1 (or 3 if you are counting from the top)- First off, the second one was horrible. No depth, blending, and the BG was out of place. The first one at least used a BG that was somewhat interesting and worked with the sig. also, it was blended well.
     
  12. Wolverine

    Wolverine Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    349
    Likes Received:
    0
    Battle 1: The bottom ones lines ruin all flow and colors of the sig.
    The top one is the winner and has good contrast and colors blend nicely.

    Battle 2: The top one is amazing. it has a nice dark depth and beautiful contrast with great blending colors. It really features the ODST character with great detail and C4d's

    The bottom one I feel is too plain. I see what you went for but you did nothing to the ODST character and nothing enough to blend the colors with the background. The top one is the winner here.
     
    #12 Wolverine, Mar 25, 2009
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2009
  13. RaBBiiTTT

    RaBBiiTTT Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,847
    Likes Received:
    1
    Battle 1

    Sig 1 because I don't see much excitement from sig 2 and the old effect really fits the arbiter.

    Battle 2

    Sig 1. Although the render may be a bit over-used, the ODST really looks good with the urban background. Sig 2 somewhat looks unprofessional, but it still is professional!
     
  14. iZumi

    iZumi Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    779
    Likes Received:
    0
    in your vote for the first battle, you either voted for the wrong one or have issues. the top one doesn't have any lines in it. that's the bottom one.
     
  15. Mace

    Mace Old Tyme
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,445
    Likes Received:
    4
    .V.

    these are my worst halo sigs............... I'm failing horribly.
     
  16. iZumi

    iZumi Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    779
    Likes Received:
    0
    this isn't much worse than your usual work.
     
  17. Mace

    Mace Old Tyme
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,445
    Likes Received:
    4
    gee, thanks for your great confindence boosting comment! and I've only ever done one other halo sig.
     

Share This Page