Hold Your Ground

AH! Flickering line! Third Picture! but thats not important right now... I agree with ya, one path only. Where exactly do the red and blue bases fit in? Do they lead up the stairs perhaps? I think you could use a picture taken from the back wall of those bases. Also consider adding a weapon list. So, you're right, this isn't the traditional conquest style map but i think you could easily change that (if you wanted to. it looks like a great map how it is). If you removed the down-hill territory in the middle and made the pit territory the central capture point, i think that would help. Or instead of doing that, add a wall through the entire pit territory, but thats iffy...But for your own style of "conquest," you did well! I just downloaded, I'll go take a closer look at your map...

 

Very smooth, and I do like conquest games, but I never get round to playing them with more than four people..
So I particularly don't mind that there is more than one path.
The center part looks great, aesthetically, and gameplay-wise.
My only point would be capture point 5 would be grenade spammed a hell of a lot.
But very well done, the interlocking and design are almost flawless.
5/5

 

nice map, third pic. is win!!
great merging/geomerging, i love the two way approach, and, though different, it looks like it would play well.
great post

 

This looks like a really good map. I like that you took the route that no one else could take. You made two paths, and I believe that would make it very fun to play. The middle looks Forgemazing (<--see what I did there). I do have a question though. Why is there a sniper rifle on one side, and a needler on the other? If that is truly the way it is, then does it balance out? Looks like a really fun map. I'll save this and download it later when I come back to it. Good map and post. Keep Forging.

 

Alright, you have a good concept comin, but there are reasons behind the "one path thing." One of them is to ensure to importance of every territory (besides the point factor). Like in capture point 5, as Camel said it would be prone easy sabotage, but it's also out of the way of the capture points. Players wouldn't feel the need the capture it as much because the bulk of what needs to be captured is in a different direction. Or you could look at it a different way: since 4 and 5 are so close, you could essentially call them the same territory. This isn't awful, but whoever owns the middle has basically earned 2 points which doesn't help with the "balance thing."

Although i do like the set up of your capture point 4. Not only does the bridge serve as a bridge, but it also is the only way out of the hole-clever idea. Overall, its a fairly smooth map, just look into some more conquest details Nice job.