Competitive Level Design Guide from a Quake 3 Perspective

Discussion in 'Halo and Forge Discussion' started by squidhands, Sep 15, 2008.

  1. squidhands

    squidhands Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,352
    Likes Received:
    1
    I found this thread over at the MLGpro forums (I even stole the thread name) and since a lot of this community doesn't regularly lurk there like I do, I thought it would be beneficial to post the link for anyone interested in it's epic read.

    Keep in mind that this is written for Quake 3, but a lot of what's in this (really, really long) guide can easily translate to Halo 3. Hope it helps.

    EDIT: Many thanks to Novak for the updated link. The previous one no longer works.

    Competitive Level Design Guide
     
    #1 squidhands, Sep 15, 2008
    Last edited: Sep 28, 2008
  2. Fritzster

    Fritzster Silly Goose
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    199
    Likes Received:
    52
    Recently this has helped me in cloudy areas in some of my newer maps, in dead ends with no flow. Skim read the layout design theory to fundamentals will help you think clearer about transitions and ultimately is better for competitive play. Some of you will be surprised how helpful this is for competitive maps in general. =)
     
  3. Jebus1001

    Jebus1001 Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    309
    Likes Received:
    0
    I really think that the section on Levels and Connectivity are very important. I think this is the reason there haven't been very many (if any) very outstanding asymmetric Forged maps. Especially the symmetry of Foundry itself tends to put Forgers into the symmetric frame-of-mind, effectively cutting the flow of creative juices to asymmetric part of their brain. (Ok so that was a super bad metaphor, sue me)

    Levels are often used improperly or are abused. I know this from personal experience, for example in my first attempt at an asymmetric map (still in progress) I'm having issues with cramped quarters. In my case the floor area is very small but the map extends very high. I would say that it would be almost as high as it is long (definitely higher than it is wide).

    My only competitive map is symmetrical which I think people tend to favour because it means we only have to think of one side ;) The reason why I wanted to try my hand at an asymmetrical map is because I wanted an Oddball map that wasn't Guardian.

    My mentality was that by building up rather than out, I could effectively create an alternative to "playing ball" on Foundry which is normally impossible. By throwing the ball down a few levels, players are forced to work their way back up to a secure set-up.

    Right now, I think that it flows decently enough, as in there's no dead-ends and there are always multiple routes to take but I wouldn't go so far as to say it's got "good Connectivity". To me it seems... disjointed...

    I think I'll put it up for testing soon but I'd say I'm far from a polished product.

    Well that sure was a mouthful... If you managed to read all this as well as the whole article I applaud you.
     
  4. Xx BEHEM0TH xX

    Xx BEHEM0TH xX Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    207
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is a very helpful guide despite the fact that it is for Quake 3. If there was one of these for Halo 3 it would be even more helpful.
     
  5. Novak

    Novak Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    670
    Likes Received:
    0
    squidhands likes this.
  6. Awkward Silence

    Awkward Silence Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    953
    Likes Received:
    1
    The link doesn't work.
     
  7. squidhands

    squidhands Ancient
    Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,352
    Likes Received:
    1

Share This Page