As long as there is evidence of the wrongdoing I see no issue with it. The action had a bad impact on one of Forgehub's members so I really see it as forgehub protecting their consumers.
My sources are telling me Multi asked to be banned, but I am not sure because it is not first hand information. I don't have Max or Wolf on discord who supposedly took care of this whole thing. I don't think it would be bad if they were transparent about their reasoning. The community is small enough that it shouldn't matter, but it sounds like there is some bureaucracy that needs to be handled first before they feel comfortable coming to a conclusion on all of it.
Those things are a blast to drive- here in the states we have their SUVs too, which come with a 707bhp engine
My issue is there is clearly at least a little evidence involved which should make it not a witch hunt.
Why not just publicly ask @Portaleer if he was responsible for the emails or not? We're you responsible @Portaleer? If he says no and there is evidence that he was responsible, strip his mod status and ban him from the site. If he owns up to it, unban multi and xandrith.
Pretty sure Snitchzel asked to be banned as well. In schitzel's case it was something where he had the urge to go in and debate and he kinda craved the forge drama, but he knew it was having a bad effect on him. By cutting his access intentionally, it got rid of that need in him. Just lets him focus on other stuff