Based on @Brotastic Bear's ideas, I decided to create my own thread. Hopefully this can help provide a good bit of feedback without necessarily taking the same amount of time as testing lobbies. Restrain yourself to maps you have played at least a few times and use the categories I use below as guidelines, but feel free to create your own as I stole most of these from @A 3 Legged Goat. (That means if you want descriptions for what some of these mean, check out his post in Bear's thread.) For example: Map: Hangar Creator: @SoloXIII Overall: 8.6/10 Aesthetics: 8.8/10 Lighting: 9/10 Originality: 6/10 Player Engagement: 7/10 Scripting: N/A Creative Object Use: 5/10 Movement: 9.2/10
This is a great idea. Any chance we could request maps to be reviewed in this manner? Perhaps keeping a list of maps on the OP until they get 2 reviews then remove them?
Here, I fixed your post. For example: Map: Hangar Creator: @SoloXIII Overall: 1/10 Aesthetics: 0.7/10 Lighting: 3/10 Originality: -7,000/10 Player Engagement: 1/10 Scripting: N/A Creative Object Use: 2/10 Movement: -7,000.01/10
There should be a realism category. Too many covenant themed maps that don't look **** like covenant.
Map: Trolls Nest Creator: For Chub Overall: 10/10 Aesthetics: 10/10 Lighting: 10/10 Originality: 0/10 Player Engagement: 10/10 Scripting: 5/10 Creative Object Use: 5/10 Movement: 10/10