It's a debate, not a random bitchfest (for those actually defending no-radar anyway). You're mad because we are trying to justify the competitive merit of having no radar. Sweet stuff. @ Bold: How many times are you going to make idiotic namecalling like that? Btw, I could care less about the tournament, since I probably won't be competing. I'm just supporting the cause.
How so? He was clearly stating that there was room for him to be less invested in the tourney, justify everything he said. Obviously.
Well, aren't you both funny? And ignorant for that matter. If you want me to compete in the tournament, I will. So I have room to discuss! I am simply willing to help persuade the holders of the tournament to not use radar in their tournament. I guess there's something wrong with that.
There is honestly no reason to debate this any further, whether it has been stated in this thread or not the pros and cons of each side are already known to us. If you want to continue the topic of the competitive aspects of radar vs no radar vs enhanced radar then make a new thread for it, but any further discussion will likely have no impact on any possible Reach tournaments.