I would've thought homosexual slander would've obviously been included in this debate considering that it is a major part of this argument. Also, he may be discriminating against homosexual beliefs, but keep in mind YOU're discriminating against his anti-homosexual beliefs (which probably aren't all religious)
dreaddraco2, I hate you. You go against some arbitrary belief I cling to, and for this I insist you have less rights, and possibly be killed like the sick freak you are. I wish that early in your life your parents had sent you to some kind of camp so they could beat whatever the hell is wrong with you out of you. But oh! Don't discriminate against my beliefs, they have an importance that succeeds that of any suffering you go through because of them.
I'm surprised your list even got responses. The stuff you posted was seriously legitimately crazy. The people explaining to you exactly why that list is so crazy, instead of just laughing it off, were doing you a favor. But of course you're looking at this as if it were a competition. People explain to you in clear and succinct ways how you're embarrassing yourself and you take it as an insult. If you want to be a better person, can the pity party routine and listen to people telling you truth.
I'm merely saying that if you're talking about his beliefs you should be arguing about WHY he believes certain anti-homosexual things, rather then the fact that he does. Also, I don't think homosexuals shouldn't be able to marry in some form without harming "normal" (when I say normal, it is based on opinion) anti-homosexual religious beliefs.