List: -Kinda simple -The light source contradicts the text shadows -The shadow of the y goes below the actual text -You tried to give a 2D object a 3D effect (text) -Uh....the rest is pretty good. :/
Um... Make the shadows go forward? I don't know how it would look, but it seems plausible. Oh and the sig is good, I just noticed the light play.
Too bad you do this every time someone tries to give you advice. The shadows are going the wrong way, it would make more sense if you had them going the way the light source is going. It's called CnC for a reason. Don't put that tag in front of your thread if your going to blatantly ignore all criticism given.
Hmm true. I ask for CnC so i can see mistakes i missed and fix them and possibly improve in the process. Same as why i have sig shops. So i can improve.
Too bad your too stupid to realize I don't ignore ever piece of criticism. Seriously, don't go quoting Mallet. Would you like me to bring up my threads with criticism that I did take?
He does take CnC.... You know how many times he fixed the sig he is currently wearing, just because you guys said the text was bad? Honestly, don't drink and post.
This whole thread has been you shooting down all the posts that actually point something out that could be fixed and make the signature better. I simply called you out on the fact you've been dodging any criticism that has come your way. No, I'm not "quoting Mallet", I have my own view points and you should cut down what I say with such condescending, self defensive, comments that so arbitrarily attack what I'm saying with no real thought out discretion. The first sentence of you post calls me stupid. With such crass deliverance in you counter points, it makes me wonder if I'll get anything short of a venomous reply filled with curses and cussing. I looked up some of your past G&A threads. I saw two or three where you took comments on the cheek and didn't attack the person trying to help you with your signature. The rest were just the opposite. You dodged every comment that went against your signature, and when called out on it, attacked with spitefully rebuttal. Please, start taking criticism at face value. Not everyone is out to get you, some people would want to help you become a better graphic designer. Open up to people's critiques and it will make all the difference.
Let's see, if I was listening to everyones criticism, I would end up with slop. Some people like it with border, some people like it without. Each criticism contradicts the other. Now if I recall, you've never taken any of my advice. Rarely does anybody. Let's see; http://www.forgehub.com/forum/graphics-arts/59877-ravage-sotw-entry.html Nope. He didn't take advice. http://www.forgehub.com/forum/graphics-arts/59883-impale.html He didn't take it. He said he would, but he still didn't. http://www.forgehub.com/forum/graphics-arts/59374-what-do-you-see.html He didn't take it. Last but not least, you.; http://www.forgehub.com/forum/graphics-arts/57834-blossoming.html You even got mad at Diz for CnCing yours the way you didn't like it. Now about my "spiteful" comments. Those were me getting pissed off at the people who "think" they can make signatures. And LOCKdownN for rating my signature horrible just because he didn't like it. Seriously, 3/10? Do you think deserves a three out of ten? I just couldn't believe it. Also, I got this far without peoples criticism. I changed a few things here and there, but that was never the style I wanted. So I did it on my own. I'll only take criticism I agree on. I can't just go taking every piece of critism. That isn't going to be my signature, that's going to be theirs.