Could use a better name. Quality looks like crap, it's all grainy. Render doesnt seem to blend or flow very well.
Ya I really wish you could have gotton better quality out of that sig, and the lighting also kind of ruins it because it doesnt go well with the colors. I would have added a nice border and text along with it, but thats just my opinion. 6.2/10
I'm not liking the colours - the greys with the blues. However, the other marks of the sig are great. Border would have ruined it, it's good you left that out. Wanna let the cat outta the bag and let me know what sort of things you used in this and your Hayabusa tag?
Maybe it's just me... I think the first 3 are basically the same picture and the 4th one is a bit different with the person moved over a bit. The picture doesn't really flow together for some reason on the left side everything is a bit noisy / darker, while on the right side it looks a bit cleaner and brighter. Like someone said earlier, it would probably look better if there was more flow to it.
Since when do renders flow? Anyway, I love it. Great effects, flow, and colors. Although the render could be a bit more blue. Last version is my fav, but that's probably just because it's a bit more fx heavy, and I'm right handed.
Looks like a very very typical stage in sig makers progress, seen a million sigs just like this lolol. To pull off this comp you'd need to clean it up a lot. I suspect this type of sig is a result of being so conscious of how it looks that you hardly dare add anything than could ruin it at each stage. Next sig you make don't worry about it looking good at the beginning, get the fundamental stuff like depth and light source then ***** slap it into looking good later on. ***** slap =/= monotone adjustment layers =]