So the **** what? If they can comprehend sex then they're obviously capable of doing stuff for them selves. Its their body whether they ruin it or not. It all comes down to that individual not the creator.
Totally off topic. Don't relate other threads to this one. I said **** boo-hoo, suck it up. Wasn't even aimed at you it was just a literal term.
WTF Radiant? You're copy/pasting things you said pages ago? Here was my reply to that, that you missed. Here's another thing you know absolutely nothing about. You want a tip on how not to sound like a dumbass? Don't make such broad generalizations. Not everyone that is rich worked hard for it, and not everyone that is poor failed highschool. Here's another really good point. Obama's raising taxes on people who make more than $250,000 a year. So we're calling them "rich". And the people who make less than that we are calling "poor". So are you telling me that a man who is a successful doctor and brings in $220,000 a year for his family is someone who threw paper balls around the classroom and lives on welfare? Are you telling me that he is lazy, and not working hard enough, and that he is just waiting for someone like Obama to come around and give him Paris Hilton's hard earned money? Are you ****ing retarded? Do you have any idea how much money $250,000 a year is? And Yellow, where do you get this information from? Do tell, please. Not only is the President decided on by electoral votes and NOT popular vote (see the 2000 election between Bush and Gore) but if you want an example of how you are wrong, I'd like to point out my state of Georgia as an example. There are a lot of black people here. A LOT. If Obama won only because of the black vote, then why did my state lose to McCain? And don't tell me that all the white people voted for him, because they didn't. A majority of them maybe, but not all.
That's easy Nev, you see the majority of the black community here in Georgia has been gerrymeandered into mainly two congressional districts namely Dekalb and Fulton. Not all African Americans voted for Obama, but since the majority of this minority has been packed and cracked they lose their voice.
I never said that the poor made less than 250,000 a year. I also never said that the poor wasted time in college. I said the rich are the ones who actually did use their time in college and a university. And we live in a democratic country, so taking money is the least democratic thing you could do, and it is still unfair.
Unless the majority thinks it is fair. Look radiant you're full of ideals but you aren't going about anything the right way. More rationale and less passion.
I know what gerrymandering is. You just sounded so "matter-of-fact" at the beginning of the post, I read it as if you were joking for some reason. That part made the whole post seem sarcastic to me for some reason...
You can't be serious? So every single rich person went to college? Some people in this world haven't even gone to college and have more money than we can imagine.
Oh okay then. To be truthfull it isn't all because of gerrymeandering though. Housing trends also have a lot to do with the political landscape of Georgia.
Listen. Let me break it down for you so you can understand. I'll hold your hand like a small child. The distinction between rich and poor, in this argument over Obama's tax policies, stems from the figure $250,000 yearly income. Basically, in this argument... if you are accusing Obama of taking from the rich and giving to the poor, then you are saying that anyone who makes less than $250,000 a year is poor. Another thing: The government takes money from everyone. It's called taxes. It's neccesary in order for the governement to function. So you're telling me now that the governement taking our money is wrong, and that it's socialist. Wow lil miss genious! So I guess our country has been socialist all along and nobody knew it? Let me try to help you understand something here Radiant. You don't belong here. You're an idiot, you can't hold up against a logical argument. You're a mindless fanatic and you have no place here in the Debates forum; unless there's a debate topic about which crayon color is prettiest. So please just crawl back to the offtopic forum where people may actually still take you seriously. Sad as that is.
Why the hell are people insulting each other? Simply giving facts with resources to prove someone wrong wasn't enough, no. You must call them names and treat them with disrespect? NO! This just shows how immature people can get. I never got the hint at Radiant implying taxes never existed. Radiant is expressing how Obama is controlling and creating taxes.
Kinda his job. Well, it will sorta be his job. Besides, it's not like he can do whatever he wants once he is President. Checks and balances are still in place people, so everyone who thinks the world will end because Obama won should just shut up. To be honest, I doubt that many of our lives will change that much because Obama won against McCain.