Casual sex is sin even in a godless, anti-Christian world; it has a purpose. To disrespect that is to disrespect yourself, at the very least. The ‘corruption’ of that file is quite tastefully done. I also learned something.
Sins, as prescribed by the Bible, only hurt the sinner. The term means "to miss the mark." It's actually an archery term. So yes, casual sex creates all sorts of problems, like seriously a ton of problems, which a lot of people don't recognize. Still, what people do recognize is and should be enough to make people reluctant to casually throw themselves into the most emotionally intimate ritual that two people can participate in with someone they barely know and have no intention of committing to. It's incredibly selfish and can seriously hurt both parties.
HOW THE **** DOES ONE N͔̙̹͇͙͍͙ͨͦͪͥ́ͦͭ̈́ͫ͆͛ͦ̚U̱͍̦̘̓͑̌̈́̎ͬͦͤ̎͆̈̈́ͦ̄C̯͍͓͙̹̳͇̫̻̲̣̜͕̑ͯ͋̍̈ͫͅͅC̲̭̦͓̰̠̆ͨ͌̈͛͂͊͊̑?
https://www.city-journal.org/html/bring-back-stigma-11807.html "Hence no shame now attaches to divorce. Serial polygamy is the norm among successful men, and those who lose out from this state of affairs—the women and children whom they abandon—have been deprived of their most important protection, which was the social penalties suffered by the malefactor. Our society lavishes much sentimental sympathy on imaginary victims, whose feckless behavior is the real cause of their misfortune, but it is utterly indifferent to the real victims, such as illegitimate or abandoned children, whose misfortune results from its own refusal to cast judgment on the wrongdoers." There's a lot more in that article, like a lot more. As a self-professed man of the scientific method, I would hope that you would at least read a bit about the evidence before brushing it all aside.
I'll will sure read this later. But to be clear, I'm most definetely a monogamous person so I didn't mean that like a free **** card or anything. Sex is just not a big deal, that's all. When you're young and not in a relationship or maybe an adult and between relationships, just live a little. Now don't freak out waywo, but we get sex education from a VERY early age here so these topics are not taboo in the family or schools. It's a form of harm reduction and education. Like we do with drugs etc. I'm on the complete opposite side of the spectrum from a lot of you guys on lots of things and I'm aware of that. But I'll read it later.
The state of your countries sexual education has nothing to do with the catastrophic effects of widespread polygamy, unless the curriculum teaches exactly that. (which I doubt)
No question - what do we use to refer to the act that hurts both actor and receiver, as well as the bonds of society? R H E T O R I C A L Q U E S T I O N
Read ‘Libido Dominandi’ Edit: Sex education in its modern form -in the US and in some other beneficiaries of the Enlightenment- is beyond low quality; parents don’t want to talk about it, they defer to public schools, which teach either abstinence or that you can rut all you want as long as you have ‘protection’ - and then parents get mad or silently encourage such behavior, worsening the direct effects or the gulf between the parental authority and the child’s reasonable respect for it. It is certainly ‘just sex’, but outside a committed, contractual, and loving relationship it becomes the rot that eats away at virtue. I can’t write a more concise post than that, there are simply too many things to take into account. Please read that book, I can PM you a pdf of it..