This is me. I must add I'm not an an American so there's that. And this is by far the most retarded test ever. That question about women lol oh my... Unheard of here I can tell you. In The Netherlands I vote social-democratic btw. Bite me.
I'm assuming you're talking about the homemaker question? Yeah that's not so crazy of a concept to certain parts of America unfortunately.
So if you are pro American you are now Literal Nazis? The only nazis I see is Antifa trying to bully pedes into silence.
Can I keep some math though? I feel like it is kind of important. I think having your own personal labels for things is not bad. Especially, if you are truly trying to understand something like you describe here. I think the problem comes from when someone thinks or tries to understand something without ever truly experiencing it then they try to create the same or a similar experience. Their explanation will be closer to the way someone who has not experienced will be leading them to lean on this explanation rather than the true explanation and will hold to this even when faced with the truth or a truer experience. Staff do your job and move these converstation's to new threads. The college basketball site I go to does this and would give you something to do.
"Anyway, the extremes we tend to go to to identify with other 'like minded' people, and the labeling that inevitably goes along with it always just strikes me as nonsensical. Trying to identify with others and highlight the ways in which we're the same is the exact opposite of what should be happening. None of us are the same. That's the beauty of us. That beauty, that uniqueness is what should be highlighted. **** sameness. It's boring. Be unique. Reject generic labels, they dehumanize you. Own your own 'you'ness." Spoiler I swear I'm not on any drugs (but maybe I should be?). ^ btw ^
I actually think it is more natural. So, I would honestly not want my wife to work whenever I get married. She has the choice but only having to worry about babysitters when you go out for a date night or an event is a positive. I think there are more positives than negatives that come out of it. --- Double Post Merged, May 17, 2017 --- anybody can do this **** lol Have you seen the Bible cod crap on the history channel before. lol
I honestly don't have time to reply anymore due to my bed is calling me. We are in different countries in different cultures. Let's just say women here are much more independent than that.
Though I purposely demonize them to make a point, a label obviously can't be good or bad, because that would be labeling a label. You'd have to be batshit crazy to do that...right? But yeah, the problem isn't with labeling, it's with the inability (or simply the lack of awareness) to recognize that the label is not the thing. Labels don't do any harm at all on their own, and in fact are necessary for communication between people to happen. In recognizing that the label is not the thing, we transcend the label, and are still able to make use of it.
I'm not sure what y'all are talking about, but I like that my wife doesn't have to work. After having 2 kids I will tell you straight up that it's a full time job taking care of them AND keeping the house clean AND keeping up with all of the bills and such. My daughter starts pre school this next year and my wife is thinking about working part time once they are both in school. There's no point at the moment because as much as day care costs most of her check would go to that anyway. I also take a little bit of pride in knowing I'm grinding enough to support the family without her having to work. Makes the sex good and way more frequent. She's way more likely to bust out a BJ after a long day of NOT going to her job she most likely hates.
Exactly, that is a fantastic example. --- Double Post Merged, May 17, 2017 --- Sorry senpai. --- Double Post Merged, May 17, 2017 --- They are here to trust me. We have a single mother issue. Which all comes back to are social programs being ****.
I will give you credit. You organized your ideas much better than some other commenters in this thread. Clamber. You are locking yourself in an animation when you could just as easily jump and keep your player model 100% capable. Since it is the same speed, if not slower, why do it? Cause you can reach higher ground than a jump, right? Well why not just make the jump height the correct value? Well, the new players seem to think that if your eyes can reach the floor you earned that spot. But did you? In classic play, you had to position yourself in the correct spot to scale the map. Vertical gameplay was dictated by the map design. In other words, you had to earn your positioning, and you were rewarded by getting to your destination. With clamber, you can just climb anything from anywhere, which instantly dumbs down the gameplay and removes depth. Why take the ramp when I can just climb? Clamber isn't pushing ramps into obsolescence. You even answer it earlier in the paragraph; clamber locks you out of attacking for a moment. And to add to that, you can use a ramp as a headglitch or bounce grenades. Risk vs Reward is essentially making a bad play, and having it work out in your favor. I think that is stupid when you can ALWAYS have things work out in your favor by doing the RIGHT thing in any given situation. This applies to every single spartan ability. Humans are not robots, we will never be perfect. One person is bound to make a mistake, and the attacker will recognize this opportunity and take advantage of it. If someone isnt able to secure a kill, it was not ment for them to have. Here is a game clip I recorded of a perfect example because of how stupidly exaggerated the whole encounter is. This guy had the advantage inicially, but couldnt finish me off. I outplayed him. (albeit, after we both made many many mistakes) http://xboxdvr.com/gamer/LargerFiend/video/22231927 Halo doesn't need sprint whether you like it or not. Even if EVERYBODY liked it, it would still not have a place in the game. You click a button to move faster, but in return you can't shoot. Balanced, right? Well why the hell is it there in the first place? You are going to get a more interesting encounter 100% of the time if both players are moving at the same speed, and capable of shooting at the same time. This isn't an opinion, it is fact. There is nothing interesting about shooting a person who sprinted past a doorway, because at that point the encounter resets. The entire reason Halo has had fair start matches was because it put everyone on an equal playing field, and the better player would be victorious. That is why everyone hated Reach and H4, because it removed the equal playing field. Now how do we make sprint fair? Give it to everyone. You say this isnt an opinon, but this is quite literally an opinion. lol. If the person Im shooting is able to run away, then I didnt deserve the kill. Weather I challenged him at a poor moment, or I lacked the accuracy to kill him, it is my poor judgement/skill that left me without the kill. These are features I enjoy in this game, you do not. We both have our preferences, this is called an opinion. If this situation does happen, then chase him down. Cut him off by taking a shorter route, or call out to a team mate. Map awareness is key. These choices allow for many more directions we chose to take certain encounters. It is up to us to differenciate all opportunites and choose the one that will best suit us. Okay, but then people were just running away from encounters the second they started losing. Instead of removing it, 343 said let's make it so your shields don't recharge. The very fact that this band-aid fix was implemented meant that sprint wasn't balanced Ya, you're right on this one. I didnt like sprint in Halo 4 because it had more advantages than disadvantages in that game. With the shield nerf, I think it is balanced now. But then you have slide (which is meaningless in Halo) If you dont like it, and it doesnt effect map design, dont use it. Simple as that. and spartan charge (which is an extended, more powerful melee) that directly buff sprinting, which incentives people to use it more often. Now just because you can't shoot while sprinting doesn't make it balanced, it is still inherently flawed. the person who is being spartan charged has more than enough time to do damage to their attacker. More often than not, I find it a burden to use. Its a very situational feature and I wouldnt miss it in all honesty. SO, if sprint is inherently flawed, why spend time trying to balance it, when the game performs optimally without the mechanic in the first place!? To make for more interesting encounters. Would you rather watch someone play tick tack toe or chess? This isn't opinionated. Lol yes it is. If you dive into the philosophy on what makes something objective, opinionated, or fact; you can plaster on any one of these labels. If you truly believe that sprinting belongs in the game, it means you are intentionally playing the game poorly. Having fun with a video game that is designed for people to have fun with is wrong. Got it. Not to mention level design has to accommodate abilities. This means you get stretched out scaling, and awkward pathing. If there is any example at all that proves that, it is H5 Truth. I mean, you don't even have to go to the towers anymore, you can just jump straight and clamber to top middle. That is awful level design. This a base and sprint movement speed problem, not an ability problem. The master chief in halo 3 moved 12mph. In halo 5, he moves 16mph without sprint. with sprint it is 20mph. The sword brings those numbers to 18 and 22 I believe. Your anger is misplaced. Yes I thing that is reduculous. That is why the maps feel stretched. that is why the spartans look tiny in them but this is an issue with base movement speed, not sprint. Also, stabilize is stupid, okay? suspending you in midair doesn't matter, because the second you get shot, you drop. Whats more competitive, jumping across a gap and snapshotting, or freezing your player in mid air to land the shot. And the second you get knocked out (if you do) you have a thruster to clear the rest of the gap anyway. You tell me which takes more skill. If you dont like it, disable it. Problem solved. Its in the controls tab. lol I would bet 100 dollars 99.9999% of halo 3 players have never pulled this off in an actual game. Anyway, this is a trick shot. There is nothing practicle about throwing away a sniper with almost 2 whole mags left if this was a competative match. I was able to land a 720 YY fakie quickscope in Modern warfare 2. Its all for show. This doenst mean that the match was competative. This is what separates the boys from the men. Now imagine if he had just jumped and stabilized, and how literally nobody would care at all. He would still have a sniper There are tons of examples like this for why abilities dumb down gameplay. They don't belong in the game no matter how you try to justify them. There are tons of examples like this as for why abilities improve gameplay. They do belong in the game no matter how you try to justify removing them.
Halo doesn't need any of the extra fluff. Bungie sabotaged reach and used it as a destiny testing ground. Sad 343i didn't see that. I honestly don't care about the H5 abilities as far as a fps goes (**** Spartan charge) they do have competive merit but is it that much to ask for a game void of them? Why can't and why shouldn't Halo be that game? It's not that the abilities don't make a competitive game, it's the fact that they change the Halo formula in such a drastic way that it becomes not a Halo game but an entirely different beast. I'm sorry but if 343i wants to make there own game, go for it, but don't take and use the Halo name sake to create a Crysis/COD/BF/Halo hybrid. That's a huge disservice to the Halo fan base simply to sell more copies and put there own "namesake" on the franchise. 343i is Dog
Do you pay phone bill, car insurance (if you even bought the car you drive, or own a car), celectric, water, rent, food (for anyone but yourself)....anything? The most common and easy to obtain entry level job is service industry, so I don't see it as anecdotal. If you'd be able to live on your own, why don't you? I think it'd be a hard slap in the face from reality for you.