If that hyena clip was in Halo 5 it would've just been a stabilize and then thrust back to the ledge and clamber up it Ahahaha so ****ing gay
All I have to say on the matter is that I hate having to overscale my maps just to ensure players can't traverse it in ways I'm not intending them to.
I can watch people argue all day about whether the new abilities are good or bad with relatively little care, but this statement captures my main frustration with the abilities. This goes hand in hand with what I hated most about Halo 4 multiplayer and eventually Halo 5. I am FIRMLY against the idea that anyone should be able to casually get to anywhere in a map in seconds. Listening to 343 talk about the brilliance of their map design and how easily people could traverse their maps pissed me off so bad. It ended up being worse than I had expected when I played it because even larger more complicated maps didn't seem to have any complicated trick jumps. As a matter of fact, they specifically said that they wanted to make trick jumps easier. This was started as far back as MCC where they said they wanted to make the classic trick jumps in Halo 2 remastered maps easier. AArrrgggg! The end result to all of this is that map design has become far more complicated and maps that could be a blast are now so easy to traverse that they might as well be flat. I would just like to point out that this opinion about trick jumps needing to be difficult is coming from a guy who has always sucked at trick jumps. I can accept that just because I can't do something doesn't mean it should be simplified.
Because people like us are making them realize they are crazy and they only understand positive reinforcement.
I love this post. I also love h0lmb0m. And Hyena. Oh man that rocketshot on Narrows was so insane. I couldn't believe it.
OMG I forgot about h0lmb0m, that dude is hilarious. --- Double Post Merged, May 17, 2017 --- Also, having flashbacks to power drains coming out of ****ING NOWHERE
I don't know what this means. Politics, lulz. What's with this compulsion to identify with a group. It's kind of...insane to feel a need to identify yourself as something that's arbitrarily defined and has no inherent meaning. That's probably the libertarian in me talking, but I couldn't tell you because I truly don't have a clue what 'libertarian' means, and I'd rather not know. a Chunk hops on soapbox I remember realizing years and years ago how my belief in labels and my habit of constantly mentally labeling everything was preventing me from experiencing reality. When I look at a tree and instantly internally label it as a tree, I'm no longer seeing the living thing that my eyes are looking at. I'm seeing a tree as something generic, and missing the uniqueness of the thing in front of me. I overlook the shape, size, and color of the leaves, the texture of the bark, the way the light of the sun reflects off of various parts of it, the dew collected on the branches, the living, vibrating energy of it. We spend 99.9% of our lives mentally referencing 'something like' what we're looking at in that given moment, and identifying it as a thing that we already know. The result is that the more we 'know' the labeled thing, the less we know the real thing that's in front of us, which can never be generic. Anyway, the extremes we tend to go to to identify with other 'like minded' people, and the labeling that inevitably goes along with it always just strikes me as nonsensical. Trying to identify with others and highlight the ways in which we're the same is the exact opposite of what should be happening. None of us are the same. That's the beauty of us. That beauty, that uniqueness is what should be highlighted. **** sameness. It's boring. Be unique. Reject generic labels, they dehumanize you. Own your own 'you'ness. a Chunk hops off soapbox. Spoiler I swear I'm not on any drugs (but maybe I should be?).
He still puts out a video sometimes. He added me once. I was happy. He only used some maps for a vid tho.