Well, according to that game, yes. I think it was just a metaphor for not walking your pets. The pokemon were disgruntled because they were never let out of their pokeballs except to fight. The same way animals get angry if they are left in their cage all day.
As will I. To avoid the government spending a few million on cleanup Texas would probably be the best location if you can find a PETA person
Causing controversy is the only thing that keeps them in the news. If they made legitimate, reasonable arguments, they wouldn't exist.
Besides the 1% of random idiots that believe them, There is 1% of people that will believe in anything so that's nothing. -News reports it because its controversial and its "cool" to make fun of video games because its the newest form of media (just as all other forms of media had to go though) so news don't have to believe it (If any, only 1% of them do) they just have to report it and make money. -Viewers don't need to believe in it (if any, only the 1% do) they just find entertainment in the controversy or absurdity or whatever reason. -There is evidence of people even high up people in PETA wearing animals or saying its ok to kill animals or they kill 95% of animals in there custody. -Animal lovers might make up more then 1% of people but they don't have to support/take seriously/believe in PETA they just have to have thought process of "I like animals>PETA is a company defending animals>I will give them some money" Because PETA is the most popular(because of controversy) which makes it the easiest way to help someone to help animals. They don't care if its PETA or not, They may even know PETA is retarded but still support it because they don't know of any alternative I would like to hear what group of people or company exactly take PETA seriously.