I'm guessing none of you have read either, or both, so I'm going to take your exasperation with a grain of salt, because you don't know any better.
Shuman...you do this with just about every argument you make. You go over the top with insinuating ignorance without actually ever presenting evidence for your view. To not "already know" your view is to be absolutely stupid so why bother presenting evidence if people are too stupid not to find it themselves. I wish all discussions could go that way, it would save everyone SOOOO much time. The few times when you do back up your point of view with something it is usually some metaphor stricken thing that exudes haughtiness. I mean I accept that I'm a stubborn person and when I am wrong I usually pushed it a little too hard thus resulting in a very weak position but I also don't exclude the possibility of being wrong or seeing that other people have potentially equal or better points of view. I unfortunately have read the Twilight series, I have yet to read the Hunger Games series, so while yes I don't know enough about the other series to make claims about it, I do know enough about the Twilight series (unfortunetly) to know that the Hunger Games would have to be down right **** to compare, which is rather unlikely. Plus the movie version has some real actors in it and so it can't be all bad. Just as comparison, 69 - Metacritic For The Hunger Games 56 - Metacritic The first Twilight movie While that isn't a huge gap and both aren't certainly "good" scores, as I said, "false equivalency".
It does cost a lot to manufacture the physical games, and I feel like most people who play them have a decent connection or access to one. You can't take an Xbox everywhere, but you can take a mobile device to a Starbucks to get wifi. Hell I think McDonalds has free wifi now. [br][/br]Edited by merge: As someone who had the misfortune of being in a car with the Twilight audiobook and someone who read the Hunger Games series I can safely say that the latter was much better.
Sure, one is extremely bad, that doesn't make Hunger Games any less average bad, and just because it includes human-hunting (which I enjoy as a plot device) doesn't blind me to the fact that in places it's poorly written and the premise poorly set-up.
Community needs a video game. I mean, ****, if south park gets one The Walking Dead and Community deserve a chance.
How does a community video game make any sense? Maybe a paintball sim with some comedy but that wouldn't be very fun.
South Park is a turn-based RPG, based on the kids playing a "fantasy game". Why not a community RPG based on the different adventures of the group. I think a TWD game kind of speaks for itself.
Community: The Video Game -Mission 1: Help the Dean pick out an outfit The dean needs to talk to a group of students out in the mezzanine about the next school dance. He needs a fabulous outfit to do so.
-Mission 2: The Winds of Chang Chang is running around the campus black-skinned, assaulting random students with automatic paintball weapons. Find him and stop him, while also learning a valuable life lesson about friendship and respect. Also, Abed and Troy do something interesting.