Well, background was C4D, the girl is a stock and that black thing is mostly DP... Made all in C4D and put together in Photoshop Made in C4D added binary in photoshop. Everything is from scratch. C4d and photoshop.
ugh everything you make is sooo awesome!!! lol... great job with these pieces. (assuming your the same guy from imagenskins) perfect job
imagenskins ? i dont go there but i just made an account... anyone can use for w.e., except the last one, because im not even supposed to post yet :O shh thanks for comments
The only one I don't particularly like is the third one, on the basis that the bright "glare" conflicts with the dark background to the point that it's a half-and-half composition. Furthermore, and unlike the other three amazing pieces you've put here, it seems like "just another abstract" piece as opposed to a unique spin on what we've seen before. I truly do love the other three pieces though, they're all very original, and even the actual look of the one I didn't enjoy is well-made.
I understand what they are, which is why I said glare. It's not that the piece in of itself is bad, it isn't, the actual makeup is fine. I just didn't like the unoriginality (for lack of a better word, it isn't exactly unoriginal) and the brightness of the object compared to the darkness of the background for the amount of space the former takes up on the piece. What I mean is, when you traditionally see a REALLY dark setting and a REALLY bright object in said setting (regardless of whether it's a reflection or an actual lightsource itself, it's still light compared to the immediate surroundings that you see), said object is normally small to highlight the brightness (read: difference compared to the background). It's not an inherent fault at all, it's just personal preference.
See how the light source, is small, while the darkness that envelops it (for dramatic effect) is big? That's what I mean. Your machine isn't in technical terms the "light source" since it's not producing the light, merely reflecting it, but in terms of the piece, it's the source of the brightness. As the source, it's huge. Personally I would've preferred an overall darkening of the piece so that you don't see the gray areas behind the machine (where presumably the off-picture light source is lighting everything) and making it pitch black back there. Then shrinking the machine so that you get a sense of scope for how dark the area is. In any case, your piece works.