If there is a BC3, it will be a long way down the track, as DICE have announced that they are working on BF3. There is nothing stopping them from continuing the story in BF3, it's all about the multiplayer.
Russians vs Americans. War on epic scales. City size maps. Lots of explosions. Wouldnt that be great?!
I wish they could get MAG for Xbox. I literally described my dream game to my friends at school, got home found out my Gameinformer had come and read about that game. Battelfield is the closest thing to it for Xbox. (From what I've heard though MAG has some serious limitations due to its being so large, so with destruction and whatnot BFBC2 may be better!)
I heard MAG went flop. Also has anyone else been swarmed by people over rank 30? Do they have a level system like halo where you get partnered with people of similar level or something?
I like the idea of MAG, you know with the whole leadership thing. I think it would be pretty beast if they lower the amount of players playing at once to at least 64 players max and tried incorporating some BC features. Like destructible objects. Making entry holes in the walls of buildings was my favorite thing about BC1, and the squads too.
@B3NW: Either people get together as friends or the squads are put together as roughly equal level teams.
I've seen heaps of people over rank 30. Half of them suck and just get carried, a third are average and rest are teh pro. I got 3 payback pins in one game. I SWEAR, the guy actually LOOKED for me to kill me. Most of his kills were from me xD
Me and Grif playing with a few others were unstoppable. We never lost and as defenders, we only ever lost a base to a dumbass teammate who kept shooting our own objectives. There was no pause in our attack rush. Just run, destroy, run, etc.
You might find this useful: Bad Company 2 Stats - Battlefield Badass You can look up anyone's stats, no matter what console they're on.
This site is way better. You can view anyone's weapon/vehicle stats, pins, insignias, and achievements. Plus you get signatures/user bars.
Shaddo, the site is great, but it's significantly out of date. I've grown 5 levels since the stats it shows of me. is this game balanced well, or is this game balanced well? Wins 85 Losses 80 Attack Wins 40 Attack Losses 35 Defend Wins 45 Defend Losses 45 yay my K/D is 1.38. Unfortunately, i dont have a signature to put that in.
The site updates fine for me... Edit: For some reason, your stats were last updated a week ago, but they will update again in 42 minutes. It should update every few hours after that.
Thats because it's not meant to be balanced. Do you think if you invaded a country, it would be balanced? No. Either you have too many people with you or the enemy is too overly defensed. One or the other, its not balanced.
I'm going to assume you are talking about Rush since Conquest is obviously balanced, but how can you say Rush isn't balanced? You switch sides on every map... Sure, it may be easier to attack, but it's not like you are defending every single round. After you defend a map, you turn around and attack it, or vise versa. So, if you had two teams that were of equal skill, you should both win when you attack, and lose when you defend. That seems pretty balanced to me.